小米 15 Pro 评测--凭借特殊显示屏，成为最高效的旗舰智能手机之一冷却效果截然不同。 购买小米 15 Pro 的用户可以享受到骁龙 8 Elite、超大硅碳电池和徕卡 Summilux 摄像头等最佳智能手机硬件。此外，小米手机还拥有极具吸引力的价格标签，但这是有条件的。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/02/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 5G Touchscreen Smartphone
小米 15 Pro 的评价在现代智能手机时代，效率变得越来越重要，在未来，这很可能成为优化资源利用的决定性因素。在这种情况下，效率意味着手机能在不消耗不必要能源的情况下可靠地执行任务。
小米公司也将此作为其 15 Pro 的销售策略。除了高性能、高效率的高通 3nm 芯片组外，这家中国制造商的最新旗舰产品还采用了特别节能、但却非常明亮的 OLED 面板。我们无法详细说明小米 15 Pro 的新显示屏在我们的能耗测量中发挥了多大作用，但这款高端手机作为一个整体无疑是非常高效的。努比亚 Z70 Ultra 等竞争对手的能耗有时是小米 15 Pro 的两倍多。
Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
此外，在散热和稳定性方面，小米旗舰机的表现也优于 OPPO Find X8 Pro 等竞争对手。虽然骁龙 8 精英版的性能略有下降，但 15 Pro 的性能远没有像 OnePlus 13 那样减半。
在摄像头方面，我们看到了一些改进的空间。用小米手机拍摄的照片并不差，但 15 Pro 还无法达到 vivo X200 Pro 的水平。像小米这样的中国制造商也需要提高透明度。考虑进口 15 Pro 的用户还应考虑到中国软件的限制（语言有限、没有Android Auto 等）。
Pros+ 超亮 LTPO 面板
+ 超强耐力
+ 高品质外观
+ 广泛的连接性
+ 卓越性能Cons- ......SoC节流适中
- 高废热
- 只能作为进口设备
- 透明度不足
- 无 eSIM 选项
价格和供应情况在中国，这款小米手机的 MRSP 为 5299 元（约合 726 美元）。您可以通过我们的合作伙伴 Trading Shenzhen 以$839.74 的价格进口这款手机。.
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.89.9%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘16 GB Memory, 1024 GB Amazon: 1. $11.99Ibywind for Xiaomi 15T Pro 5...2. $7.59Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1...3. $5.99Kicvbnco 3 Pack For Xiaomi 1...List Price: 810€213 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440521 PPIAMOLED
2.87.6%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘16 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $999.99OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ...2. $9.99JZG 3 Pack Screen Protector ...3. $12.98HOMEMO [2+2 Pack] for OnePlu...List Price: 720€213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440510 PPIAMOLED
3.86.7%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘15 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. $6.91TNKISRY Cover for Vivo X200 ...2. $22.98AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...3. $11.99AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...List Price: 850€223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260453 PPIOLED
4.89.8% v7 (old)Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: $706.48List Price: 1149€196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"3120x1440513 PPIAMOLED
5.85.7%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘16 GB Memory, 128 GB Amazon: 1. $949.99Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...2. $879.99Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...3. $899.97Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2856x1280495 PPIOLED
6.89.4% v7 (old)Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $347.50XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl...2. $309.99Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G ...3. $729.99Xiaomi 14 5G (512GB + 12GB) ...List Price: 790€223 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440521 PPIAMOLED
Table of Contents小米 15 Pro 的评价小米 15 Pro 的规格手机壳 - 小米手机防水连接性 - 配备高速 USB 端口的小米 15 Pro软件 - 小米手机配备Android 15通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 小米 15 Pro 采用双 GPS电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双卡双待的小米智能手机摄像头 - 小米 15 Pro 使用 Light Fusion 900配件和保修 - 小米手机附带电源输入设备与操作 - 配备新型超声波传感器的小米手机显示屏 - 据说小米 15 Pro 特别节能性能 - 配备骁龙 8 精英处理器的小米手机游戏 - 小米 15 Pro 每秒只能运行 90 帧废气排放 - 小米手机温度较高电池续航时间 - 采用全新电池技术的小米 15 ProNotebookcheck 总评分
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
除了 小米 15之外，这家来自远东的科技巨头还发布了其最新旗舰手机--小米 15 Pro。这款高端智能手机与其更为小巧的姊妹机型有一些相似之处--例如，它采用了 高通骁龙 8 精英版但据小米公司称，它还采用了特殊的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏。在亮度相同的情况下，与大多数竞争对手的显示屏相比，它的能耗应该会大大降低。 竞争对手.此外，它还配备了一块 6100 毫安时的大容量电池，采用硅碳负极。
与 小米 14 系列小米 15 系列很可能无法在美国购买。不过，你仍然可以从某些零售商那里进口这款手机。
小米 15 Pro 的规格
Xiaomi 15 Pro (15 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 830Memory16 GB Display6.73 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 521 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB , 972 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G：n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n20 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n79 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89; 4G：FDD-LTE：B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B26 / B28 / B66, TDD-LTE：B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48 / B41; 3G：B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 161.3 x 75.3Battery6100 mAh Silicon-CarbonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.4, 23 mm, OIS, 1/1,31 inch) + 50 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.5, 120 mm, OIS, tele) + 50 MPix (f/2.2, 14 mm, ultrawide)Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 22 mm, FF)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, case, charger, USB cable, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproofWeight213 g, Power Supply: 95 g
Price810 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
手机壳 - 小米手机防水小米 15 Pro 的外壳采用了优质材料，拥有出色的做工。背面和正面都采用了该公司自己的第二代龙晶玻璃或小米盾形玻璃（国际名称）。这应该会使这款旗舰手机更加抗冲击。小米 15 Pro 的外观采用铝制边框，与玻璃材质完美融合。这使得手机外壳手感极佳，质地均匀。
总体而言，由于采用了纤薄的显示屏边框和高效的正面与表面比例，该设备的设计看起来非常时尚。小米手机的外壳厚度为 8.5 毫米，重量为 213 克，尽管电池容量很大，但并不显得非常笨重。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
小米 15 Pro 的颜色选择（图片来源：小米中国）
小米 15 Pro 共有四种配色，包括两个比较经典的版本（白色、灰色）和两个比较特别的版本（银色、绿色）。每种颜色都采用了磨砂表面处理，只能轻微显示指纹痕迹。手机壳通过了 IP68 标准认证，这意味着该设计具有防尘和防水功能，即使在雨中将手机带出也不会损坏。此外，背面摄像头模块配备了陶瓷镜头，据制造商称，这种镜头具有很强的耐磨性。
尺寸比较
OnePlus 13 Vivo X200 Pro Xiaomi 15 Pro Xiaomi 14 Pro Samsung Galaxy S24+ Google Pixel 9 Pro DIN A6 ❌
连接性 - 配备高速 USB 端口的小米 15 Pro与前代机型相比，当前小米旗舰机的可用内存/存储版本（分别使用 LPDDR5X 和 UFS 4.0）以及相应的价格几乎没有变化。 前代机型相比.基本型号仅配备 12 GB 内存，而顶配版本则配备 16 GB 内存。不过，小米并没有像 OnePlus 13 那样提供 24 GB 版本。 一加 13.
智能手机上的专用内部芯片组保护用户的敏感信息，如生物识别数据和密码。
与 14 Pro 相比，该手机的连接功能没有任何变化：蓝牙 5.4、NFC 芯片、Miracast 和红外爆破器一应俱全。USB OTG、有线图像输出和快速 USB 端口也一应俱全。不过，13 Pro 的 UWB 芯片在 2024 机型上再次缺失。
箱体左侧
机箱右侧（按钮：开/关、音量）
机身底部侧面（扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽）
顶部箱体侧面软件 - 小米手机配备Android 15小米 15 Pro 搭载了该厂商自己的第二代 HyperOS，包括 Play Protect 认证。由于中国版产品并不直接支持谷歌服务，因此使用的是中国服务和小米自己的服务。不过，与 华为智能手机不同的是，小米智能手机不支持谷歌服务。手机出厂时已经预装了谷歌框架，因此只需通过内部应用商店手动安装 PlayStore 即可。遗憾的是，除了中文和英文外，无法选择其他语言包。不过，在不久的将来，xiaomi.eu ROM 可能也会提供给 Pro 版本闪存。
小米只公布了针对中国市场的软件更新信息。目前的 小米 14 代提供四年的Android 升级和五年的安全补丁。这是否也适用于可能只在中国发售的 15 Pro，还有待观察。
在测试时，小米手机的最新安全补丁是 2024 年 12 月的。中国 ROM 的更新速度通常不错，但小米不太可能像谷歌那样每月更新一次。 谷歌或 三星.
可持续性15 Pro 的包装似乎没有使用塑料，但设备本身是用铝箔纸包裹的。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。
小米没有提供任何关于 15 系列所使用材料及其回收率的准确信息，但该制造商确实表示，它正在增加所有智能手机对回收材料的使用，包括铝、金和铜。该公司在智能手机和配件中使用生物基高分子材料以及从废弃渔网中回收的塑料，也是为了最大限度地减少生态足迹。详细信息可能只会在全球机型的可持续发展报告中提供。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 小米 15 Pro 采用双 GPS在家庭网络中，小米 15 Pro 使用包括 MU-MIMO 支持在内的现代 WiFi 7 标准，但根据数据表，它只能使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段建立连接。不过，在我们的测试中，6 GHz 频段也能被识别，当与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 一起接收时，我们测得的传输速率几乎超过了 1,500 MBit/s。不过，它的发送速率并不是最好的，而且波动很大。
遗憾的是，在测量过程中，即使使用 6 GHz 频段，我们也无法完全使用 WiFi 7。原因是合适的路由器（尤其是带有 10 GBit LAN 端口的路由器）仍然很难找到。
旗舰手机最多只能使用 5G 网络访问网络，并支持多种频率--LTE 标准也是如此。甚至 20 和 28 频段也已搭载在中国版本上。根据小米的说法，集成调制解调器使用人工智能，始终根据智能手机的握持方式选择最佳天线。不过，我们并不认为它是一款真正的 "世界手机"，正如制造商所称，它支持 22 个 LTE 频段。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzGoogle Pixel 9 ProWi-Fi 7
1830 (1666min - 1889max) MBit/s +124%OnePlus 13Wi-Fi 7
1791 (1704min - 1904max) MBit/s +119%Xiaomi 14 ProWi-Fi 7
1728 (1374min - 1860max) MBit/s +112%Samsung Galaxy S24+Wi-Fi 6E
1581 (1247min - 1658max) MBit/s +94%Average Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=48)
1541 MBit/s +89%Average of class Smartphone (508 - 1945, n=96, last 2 years)
1320 MBit/s +62%Xiaomi 15 ProWi-Fi 7
816 (564min - 966max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzXiaomi 14 ProWi-Fi 7
1731 (1657min - 1754max) MBit/s +14%Google Pixel 9 ProWi-Fi 7
1602 (1387min - 1829max) MBit/s +5%Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=48)
1525 MBit/s 0%Xiaomi 15 ProWi-Fi 7
1520 (1364min - 1602max) MBit/s OnePlus 13Wi-Fi 7
1464 (769min - 1573max) MBit/s -4%Average of class Smartphone (451 - 1870, n=96, last 2 years)
1384 MBit/s -9%Samsung Galaxy S24+Wi-Fi 6E
1117 (1031min - 1173max) MBit/s -27%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (564-966) Xiaomi 15 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1364-1602) Vivo X200 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (462-1020) Vivo X200 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø966 (769-1014)
室内定位服务
外部定位服务在我们的实际测试中，小米手机拥有良好的定位能力。不过，对于一款支持双全球导航卫星系统的智能手机来说，我们并不希望它出现较大的偏差。小米 15 Pro 准确地显示了我们行进的距离。我们用于对比的 Garmin Venu 2 显示的路线非常相似。在日常使用中，小米手机的精度足以胜任导航任务。
小米手机的定位服务使用了所有主要的卫星系统：北斗 (B1I + B1C+ B2a)、GPS (L1+L5)、伽利略 (E1+E5) 和格洛纳斯 (G1) 以及 QZSS (L1+L5)，精度高达 3 米。
Garmin Venu 2
小米 15 Pro
电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双卡双待的小米智能手机
小米 15 Pro 的通话质量一直很好，无论是在嘈杂还是安静的环境中，这款高端智能手机在移动通话时都表现出色。声音传输清晰无失真，噪音得到有效抑制，即使在嘈杂环境中也能确保良好的清晰度。
小米 15 Pro 完全支持双卡双待，有两个使用 5G 网络的 nano SIM 卡插槽。在中国版的系统设置中没有集成 eSIM 卡的选项。
摄像头 - 小米 15 Pro 使用 Light Fusion 900小米 15 Pro 的自拍照 小米 15 Pro 前置的 3200 万像素摄像头没有使用像素分选或自动对焦功能。不过，这款旗舰手机的自拍效果不错，清晰度尚可，但图像容易曝光过度。由于支持 4K60，骁龙 8 Elite 智能手机在录制视频时也表现出色。
积极地说，小米并没有对其主摄像头进行试验，而是采用了与 14 Pro.Light Hunter 900 是与徕卡合作开发的，原生分辨率为 5000 万像素，通常通过 4 比 1 分档合并成 1250 万像素的照片和超级像素。1/1.31 英寸规格的传感器具有漂亮的细节深度和精确的对焦，以及极高的拍摄速度。不过，前代产品的可变光圈控制功能现在已不见踪影--不管是出于什么原因。得益于其 f/1.44 大光圈和光学防抖功能，您仍然可以在弱光环境下拍摄出令人印象深刻的照片。
0.6x
1x
2x
5x
10x
20x
120倍（最大值）同样，超广角镜头也没有任何变化。5000 万像素传感器的焦距为 14 毫米（等效 35 毫米），在这个价位的相机中，它的成像质量相当不错。其对焦距离最短可达 5 厘米，可进行超微距拍摄。
另一方面，基于索尼 IMX858 的 120 毫米徕卡潜望镜镜头也是一款新产品，同样具有 5000 万像素的分辨率和 OIS 功能。该长焦镜头具有五倍无损变焦，可提供高达 10 倍的清晰度，包括大量细节。结合数字 "AI 变焦"，小米 15 Pro 可实现高达 20 倍的稳定变焦拍摄。
小米 15 Pro 在视频录制方面也大有可为。移动图像支持杜比视界（Dolby Vision）和 HDR10+，最高可录制 8K 高分辨率（30 帧/秒）或 UHD 画质（最高 60 帧/秒）。此外，还配备了专业视频模式。
主摄像头能很好地稳定视频，但无法在拍摄时更换镜头。这有点遗憾，因为不同相机的曝光和白平衡几乎没有差别。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angleclick to load imagesXiaomi 15 ProApple iPhone 15 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 15 ProApple iPhone 15 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 15 ProApple iPhone 15 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi 15 ProApple iPhone 15 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
在可控照明条件下，我们将主摄像头的色彩还原与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。在描绘 ColorChecker Passport 时，5000 万像素镜头显示出一些增亮和过饱和现象，尤其是绿色和蓝色色调，而小米 15 Pro 在色彩保真度方面确实存在一些异常值（>10）。
5.4 ∆E7.3 ∆E14.6 ∆E11.9 ∆E11 ∆E7.1 ∆E2.5 ∆E17.2 ∆E6.7 ∆E3.8 ∆E5.8 ∆E3.2 ∆E10.4 ∆E11.8 ∆E8.2 ∆E3 ∆E6 ∆E11.2 ∆E4.6 ∆E3.7 ∆E7.9 ∆E11.1 ∆E4.3 ∆E8.6 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Pro: 7.81 ∆E min: 2.52 - max: 17.22 ∆E22.3 ∆E25.8 ∆E17.5 ∆E20.8 ∆E21.1 ∆E22.6 ∆E31.5 ∆E12.5 ∆E20.4 ∆E12.2 ∆E19.9 ∆E33 ∆E12.1 ∆E23.5 ∆E19.2 ∆E21.1 ∆E21.3 ∆E23.8 ∆E20.4 ∆E19.6 ∆E23.4 ∆E24.9 ∆E17.9 ∆E12.3 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi 15 Pro: 20.81 ∆E min: 12.08 - max: 33 ∆E
Xiaomi 15 ProXiaomi 15 Pro
配件和保修 - 小米手机附带电源小米 15 Pro 的电源手机的供货范围包括 90 瓦快速充电电源适配器、保护盖、数据线或充电线（USB-A 至 USB-C）、SIM 卡针和快速入门指南。屏幕上预装了保护膜。在中国版的交货范围内，我们在深圳贸易公司的借用设备中增加了一个欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。
我们的进口设备提供 12 个月保修。如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。
输入设备与操作 - 配备新型超声波传感器的小米手机按键的位置符合人体工程学原理，其良好的受力点可实现精确操作。6.73 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏上的输入也能准确识别。得益于高达 120 Hz 的高刷新率，这款旗舰手机在日常使用中运行流畅，动画效果漂亮。由于采样率高达 300 Hz，面板还能对触摸做出快速反应。
新的超声波传感器可用于指纹生物识别解锁。在我们的测试过程中，小米手机能可靠地解锁显示屏，而且无需长时间等待。您还可以使用前置摄像头进行安全性较低的 2D 面部识别。
显示屏 - 据说小米 15 Pro 特别节能OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成小米在其最新旗舰产品中采用了分辨率高达 1440p 的 LTPO AMOLED 面板。据该制造商称，所使用的 M9 材料可确保极高的出光率，从而在与竞争对手亮度相同的情况下降低功耗。它还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证（无闪烁、低蓝光含量、"昼夜节律友好"）。
根据数据表，该面板可在 1 赫兹和 120 赫兹之间动态调节帧频，峰值亮度为 3,200 尼特。幸运的是，在与日常使用相关的 APL18 测试中，我们测得的亮度甚至超过了这一数值，达到了 3526 cd/m²--在智能手机上播放 HDR 内容时，亮度通常会稍高一些。但即便如此，高动态范围的视频内容也能显示得非常出色，而且它支持多种标准（HDR 10+、杜比视界、HDR Vivid、HLG）。
1025cd/m²1016cd/m²1008cd/m²1012cd/m²1016cd/m²1018cd/m²1031cd/m²1022cd/m²1007cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 1031 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1017.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %Center on Battery: 1016 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.15 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6677 K
Xiaomi 15 ProAMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"OnePlus 13AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"Vivo X200 ProOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"Samsung Galaxy S24+AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"Google Pixel 9 ProOLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"Xiaomi 14 ProAMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"Screen18%49%-26%52%1%Brightness middle (cd/m²)10161155 14%1828 80%1358 34%2083 105%1025 1%Brightness (cd/m²)10171155 14%1828 80%1358 34%2016 98%1046 3%Brightness Distribution (%)9898 0%94 -4%92 -6%84 -14%95 -3%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.151 13%0.7 39%3 -161%0.7 39%1.1 4%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.571.8 50%1.6 55%4.4 -23%2 44%2.9 19%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.91.6 16%1.1 42%2.5 -32%1.1 42%2.2 -16%Gamma2.2 100%2.3 96%2.25 98%1.98 111%2.22 99%2.25 98%CCT6677 97%6503 100%6520 100%6656 98%6560 99%6622 98%* ... smaller is better
与 OLED 的典型做法一样，该手机使用 PWM 调制来控制屏幕亮度，这表现为屏幕闪烁。我们无法确认其数据表中所述的高频率（1,920 Hz）--我们对显示屏的测量结果约为 407 Hz。不过，即使对于敏感的用户来说，视觉上可感知的亮度波动也应该很容易被眼睛察觉，因为在我们使用示波器进行测量时，振幅曲线非常均匀，调制深度也非常平缓，仅为 7%。
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.5 HzAmplitude: 7 %The display backlight flickers at 119.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 119.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8088 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
100% 亮度
50% 亮度
25% 亮度
最低亮度带固定变焦设置的测量系列
屏幕色彩显示的设置选项非常丰富。有三种色彩配置文件和一种 "高级 "模式，可以设置色温和个别参数，如饱和度或色彩空间。
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件检查了色彩校准的偏差。使用 "专业 "配置文件时，各色彩之间的差异几乎看不出来。我们测量的 DeltaE 值表明，色彩和灰度的偏差非常小。
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise↘ 1.4 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey2.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise↘ 1.3 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
在室外，小米 15 Pro 给人留下了非常深刻的印象。即使在夏季阳光直射的情况下，显示内容依然清晰可见。在视角稳定性方面，我们也没有什么可抱怨的。即使从非常平的角度观看，OLED 面板的色彩也能保持稳定。
性能 - 配备骁龙 8 精英处理器的小米手机如果你想在智能手机中使用目前最好的芯片组，那么小米 15 Pro 就是你的最佳选择。凭借 Oryon 性能内核和 4.32 GHz 的峰值时钟频率，小米 15 Pro 骁龙 8 精英版提供了充足的动力，甚至比 Apple A18 Pro在 Geekbench 多核测试中也只能排在后面。但即使是 Dimensity 9400在 X200 Pro在单核测试中也明显落于下风，可见其性能之高。不过，人工智能基准测试并非高通 SoC 的强项。
Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3089 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=29)
3047 Points -1%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2748 Points -11%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2278 Points -26%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -33%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -36%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1783 Points -42% Multi-CoreXiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9404 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7656 - 10401, n=29)
9188 Points -2%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
8574 Points -9%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6875 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -31%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5214 Points -45%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -49%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2099 - 2286, n=11)
2206 Points +1%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2192 Points 0%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2189 Points Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1998 Points -9%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1687 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -28%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -37%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=121, last 2 years)
1249 Points -43% Multi-CoreVivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
8126 Points +7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (6384 - 8816, n=11)
7614 Points +1%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7570 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points -10%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6439 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points -22%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=121, last 2 years)
4304 Points -43%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -50%Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2762122 Points +6%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2705165 Points +4%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2090799 - 3015111, n=21)
2655782 Points +2%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2611586 Points Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1905751 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -32%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=151, last 2 years)
1512195 Points -42%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -56%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14366 - 27428, n=24)
20539 Points +13%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points +9%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18231 Points Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -4%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15876 Points -13%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
15849 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=184, last 2 years)
14923 Points -18%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -35%CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2485 Points -7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1064 - 2674, n=18)
1887 Points -29%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1663 Points -38%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points -52%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=122, last 2 years)
1169 Points -56%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1167 Points -56%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -62%BaseMark OS II
OverallVivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
12594 Points +39%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8155 - 14066, n=20)
11227 Points +24%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10937 Points +21%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points +4%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9067 Points Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=147, last 2 years)
7803 Points -14%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -15%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100% SystemVivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
16162 Points +8%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=20)
15757 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points +2%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14976 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14039 Points -6%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=147, last 2 years)
11595 Points -23%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -46% MemoryVivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13673 Points +74%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7081 - 20572, n=20)
13525 Points +72%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11536 Points +47%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points +30%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points +29%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=147, last 2 years)
8860 Points +13%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7873 Points GraphicsAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35063 - 384996, n=20)
58142 Points +32%Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
51898 Points +18%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
44154 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43637 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=147, last 2 years)
26407 Points -40%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -42%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -48% WebVivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
2183 Points +71%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2091 Points +64%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points +56%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2370, n=20)
1899 Points +49%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points +47%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2468, n=147, last 2 years)
1714 Points +34%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1278 Points UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
81594 Points +284%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +72%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
22767 Points +7%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21254 Points Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=134, last 2 years)
20062 Points -6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=18)
17747 Points -17%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16988 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -47%AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
52884 Points +2561%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=121, last 2 years)
26112 Points +1214%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=16)
20815 Points +948%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1987 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1982 Points 0%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -42%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -44%Xiaomi 14 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points -100%Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
13084 Points +671%Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=53, last 2 years)
1916 Points +13%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1698 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1375 Points -19%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (555 - 1708, n=15)
1121 Points -34% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9453 Points +1220%Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=53, last 2 years)
1181 Points +65%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
716 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
654 Points -9%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (218 - 734, n=15)
490 Points -32% Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
1501 Points +108%Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
722 Points OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
689 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=53, last 2 years)
516 Points -29%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (255 - 738, n=15)
503 Points -30%AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi 15 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10739 Points Vivo X200 ProMediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360
9873 Points -8%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 17293, n=16)
9626 Points -10%Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=76, last 2 years)
5062 Points -53%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points -90%OnePlus 13Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
734 Points -93%
集成 Adreno 830负责手机内部的图形运算，在基准测试中，它无需惧怕任何人。它的性能明显优于 Immortalis G925在苛刻的层级测试中，你甚至可以期待在高 4K 分辨率下达到每秒近 50 帧的速度。然而 一加 13的每秒帧数甚至比 骁龙 8 精英版在 GFXBench 中的每秒帧数更高。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6789 Points +4%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6521 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6417 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -35%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -60%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6754 Points +3%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6567 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6432 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -35%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -61%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25785 Points +1%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25431 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22987 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -48%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -63%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11821 Points +1%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11476 Points -2%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points -25%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points +3%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11589 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11504 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points -24%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2602 Points OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2567 Points -1%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2509 Points -4%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -61%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2599 Points +1%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2576 Points Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2495 Points -3%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -61%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
791 fps +4%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
768 fps +1%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
763 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
543 fps -29%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -46%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -50%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
502 fps +19%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +18%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
362 fps -14%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps -27%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -42%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
365 fps +19%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
354 fps +15%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
269 fps -13%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps -21%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -46%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -27%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +2%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -10%Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps -24%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -33%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -59%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +13%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -28%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -36%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -43%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -56%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +15%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +3%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85 fps -24%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -33%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -61%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -9%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -31%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +16%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +8%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps -24%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -36%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -57%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +10%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +8%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps Xiaomi 14 ProAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps -19%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -29%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -58%
小米手机在浏览器速度方面表现出色，其基准测试结果非常好。在日常使用中，网站打开速度很快，滚动浏览也很流畅。
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
276.321 Points OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
238.78 Points -14%Vivo X200 Pro
234 Points -15%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=18)
217 Points -21%Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
162.564 Points -41%Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=148, last 2 years)
156.9 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -50%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -61%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
31.6 runs/min +9%Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
28.9 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (11.7 - 36.8, n=17)
23.9 runs/min -17%Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
17.7 runs/min -39%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -45%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)
14.7 runs/min -49%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
255 Points OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
235 Points -8%Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
225 Points -12%Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
181 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points -31%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=18)
166.8 Points -35%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=144, last 2 years)
147.2 Points -42%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -58%Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points +9%Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
86943 Points +3%Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
84676 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=25)
69129 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points -25%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -28%Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
54365 Points -36%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=195, last 2 years)
49403 Points -42%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=154, last 2 years)
1147 ms * -171%Xiaomi 14 Pro (Chrome 120)
801.6 ms * -89%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -65%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * -49%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1258, n=20)
588 ms * -39%OnePlus 13 (Chrome 131)
432.7 ms * -2%Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)
431.56 ms * -2%Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
423.11 ms * * ... smaller is better
在存储速度方面，该手机的 UFS 4.0 存储系统表现出色。在写入和读取小数据块时，其 AndroBench 数值尤其出色。
Xiaomi 15 ProOnePlus 13Vivo X200 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+Google Pixel 9 ProAverage 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-16%-20%-43%-63%-8%-40% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)3998.653984.23 0%2694.85 -33%2450.9 -39%1717.9 -57%3428 ?(998 - 4027, n=13) -14%2243 ?(270 - 4370, n=194, last 2 years) -44% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3673.383684.36 0%2174.26 -41%1523.87 -59%253.53 -93%3211 ?(936 - 3908, n=13) -13%1865 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=194, last 2 years) -49% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)409.67301.29 -26%317.29 -23%387.42 -5%218.41 -47%395 ?(269 - 462, n=13) -4%296 ?(47.6 - 576, n=194, last 2 years) -28% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)555.55344.63 -38%658.43 19%176.19 -68%261.55 -53%543 ?(342 - 753, n=13) -2%339 ?(9.4 - 987, n=194, last 2 years) -39%
游戏 - 小米 15 Pro 每秒只能运行 90 帧让我们来看看 Adreno GPU是否适合 HFR 游戏，请使用GameBench应用程序。在《PUBG Mobile》中，选择低图形设置时，它能达到 90 帧/秒，但使用最高细节时，平均只能达到 40 帧/秒。小米 15 Pro 可以轻松显示 120 fps 的射击游戏选项，但在测试时却不见踪影。在最高图形设置下，小米智能手机可以以 60 帧/秒的速度显示要求较高的游戏《源氏冲击》--目前在Android 上还无法实现。
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
Xiaomi 15 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.7 (48-60) Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.6 (80-90) Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.9 (57-61) Xiaomi 15 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø40 (36-41)
废气排放 - 小米手机温度较高温度小米 15 Pro 将 SoC 的废热均匀地导出机壳。我们在摄像头区域测得的温度超过 46 °C，而在背面的下壳区域测得的温度低于 40 °C。不过，更令人感兴趣的是它在负载下的性能。
幸运的是，在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中，这款小米旗舰机只出现了约 16% 至 25% 的中度节流。这意味着 15 Pro 的性能明显优于其较小的 姐妹机型和 一加 13或 OPPO Find X8 Pro.不过，骁龙 骁龙 SoC系统性能的下降，例如在运行高要求游戏和长时间游戏时。
Max. LoadIdle
45.2 °C43.9 °C39.3 °C 47.9 °C45.3 °C39.8 °C 49.3 °C45.2 °C40 °C
Maximum: 49.3 °CAverage: 44 °C
38.1 °C41.9 °C38 °C39.4 °C43.9 °C40.7 °C40 °C44.8 °C46.5 °C
Maximum: 46.5 °CAverage: 41.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.1 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
26.8 °C26.3 °C26.1 °C 26.9 °C26.7 °C26.5 °C 26.9 °C26.7 °C26.4 °C
Maximum: 26.9 °CAverage: 26.6 °C
25.8 °C26.1 °C26.1 °C26 °C26.3 °C26.1 °C26.3 °C26.5 °C26.9 °C
Maximum: 26.9 °CAverage: 26.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 39.5 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilitySamsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +9%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.3 % Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % -10%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % -26%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -46% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestSamsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +8%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.8 % Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % -9%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 % -33%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.8 % -34% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 % Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -29%Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 % -42%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -43% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +1%Xiaomi 15 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % Vivo X200 ProImmortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.5 % -26%OnePlus 13Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % -34%
Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø28.8 (26.6-35) OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.1 (19.9-39) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø103.5 (96.3-128) OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø92.1 (73.8-132.4) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø29.4 (28.1-33.5) OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø28.1 (19-39.4) Xiaomi 15 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.2 (13.9-18.1) OnePlus 13 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.1 (9.52-18.8)
发言人在音质方面，小米 15 Pro 并没有树立新的标准，但它的立体声扬声器仍然拥有悦耳的声音和轻盈的低音。不过，其波澜不惊的中高音效果并不理想。
如果你想从外部播放音乐，可以使用有线 USB-C 端口，或者蓝牙 5.4。后者使用相对较多的编解码器和 Auracast。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi 15 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 14 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 采用全新电池技术的小米 15 Pro耗电量小米 15 Pro 采用先进的电池，阳极中结合了硅和碳，因此容量非常高。这块 6100 毫安时的储能电池可以通过 USB-C 接口以最高 90 瓦的功率充电，也可以通过无线方式以 50 瓦的功率充电。此外，它还支持常见的快速充电协议（包括 QC3+ 或 PD3.0）。在测试过程中，我们注意到在启动升压模式时充电时间约为 50 分钟。
无论是在空闲模式还是在负载情况下，它的功耗都非常高效。它的功耗不到 1 瓦，与我们的对比设备（如 努比亚 Z70 Ultra与 骁龙 8 精英版.
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.1 / 0.2 WattIdle 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.1 Watt
Load
6.7 / 9.5 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15 Pro6100 mAhOnePlus 136000 mAhVivo X200 Pro6000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S24+4900 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAhXiaomi 14 Pro4880 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption-58%-39%-5%-30%-19%-61%-34%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.60.86 -43%0.43 28%0.43 28%0.59 2%0.89 -48%1.09 ?(0.42 - 3.8, n=24) -82%0.843 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=164, last 2 years) -41%Idle Average * (Watt)0.91.74 -93%1.76 -96%0.84 7%1.1 -22%1.05 -17%1.66 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=24) -84%1.436 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=164, last 2 years) -60%Idle Maximum * (Watt)1.11.85 -68%1.83 -66%0.95 14%1.2 -9%1.11 -1%1.879 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=24) -71%1.62 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=164, last 2 years) -47%Load Average * (Watt)6.710.69 -60%9.58 -43%6.76 -1%7.15 -7%9.03 -35%8.87 ?(5.8 - 13, n=19) -32%7.04 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) -5%Load Maximum * (Watt)9.511.92 -25%11.43 -20%16.42 -73%20.37 -114%9.06 5%12.8 ?(8.74 - 19.5, n=19) -35%11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=141, last 2 years) -19%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38) OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.08 (0.705-11.9) Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962) OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41) OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (8.53-11.9) Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962) OnePlus 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.621 (0.576-0.765)
运行时间大容量电池帮助小米 15 Pro 实现了非常出色的续航时间。我们在调整显示亮度（150 cd/m²）后得出的数值具有最佳可比性，因为所有测试设备的数值都相同。在这里，小米手机在使用 Wi-Fi 上网时仅在超过 23 小时后才关机，而在无 Wi-Fi 的无尽视频播放测试中，其续航时间也达到了 37 小时。
请注意：我们将很快添加空闲值。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
51h 33min
WiFi Websurfing
24h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
37h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 24min
Xiaomi 15 Pro6100 mAhOnePlus 136000 mAhVivo X200 Pro6000 mAhSamsung Galaxy S24+4900 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAhXiaomi 14 Pro4880 mAhBattery runtime-10%-3%-30%-29%-34%Reader / Idle (h)51.637.8 -27%33.3 -35%H.264 (h)37.138.7 4%24 -35%WiFi v1.3 (h)24.122.5 -7%23.4 -3%16.8 -30%17 -29%15 -38%Load (h)4.44 -9%3.2 -27%
Notebookcheck 总评分尽管有进口限制，但小米 15 Pro 确实是个不错的选择，因为它的性价比确实令人印象深刻。
Back to the verdict
Xiaomi 15 Pro
- 12/29/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis92%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity68 / 69 → 98%
Weight88%
Battery93%
Display92%
Games Performance49 / 55 → 90%
Application Performance84 / 85 → 99%
AI Performance46%
Temperature83%
Noise100%
Audio81 / 90 → 90%
Camera82%
Average70%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials50%Packaging50%Power Use96.3%Repairability35%Software Updates68.3% Total Sustainability Score: 49.9%
More articles related to this deviceXiaomi 15 Pro (15 Series)News•2026 年初的最佳中端摄影智能手机 |News•小米 15T：中端智能手机中的性价比之王 |News•小米 15T 评测：价格实惠的Android 智能手机视频效果如何？ |Review•小米 15T 评测--降价让这款Android 智能手机最划算 |Review•小米 15T Pro 评测--拍照手机中被低估的精品 |News•小米 17 系列总出货量预计低于小米 15 系列，iPhone 17 蚕食了小米 17 的销量基础 |News•相机大战：300 美元手机击退 1870 美元手机，三星胜出 |News•我们测试了最好的智能手机相机：我们的结论和专业摄影师的 RAW 文件 |News•小米 15 Ultra "徕卡 100 周年 "限量版像经典徕卡相机一样呈现铜绿光泽 |News•对小米 15S Pro 的评价：2025 年最佳智能手机之一 |Review•小米 15S Pro 评测：旗舰智能手机的新独立性和强大电池续航能力 |News•小米已在研发 XRing O2 处理器 |News•小米 15 Ultra 徕卡旗舰限量发售，配全新相机手柄 |News•小米 XRing O1 评测抢先看：小米新 SoC 与骁龙 8 精英版的比较 |Review•小米 15 Ultra 评测--搭载徕卡的动力之王 |News•小米 15 Ultra：三款 AI 照片编辑工具上手体验 |News•小米 15 Ultra 徕卡相机测试：变焦性能之王，但未能进入 DxOMark 前十名 |News•小米 15 Ultra 配备徕卡 Ultrapure 光学系统：令人印象深刻的夜景和人像照片 ...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 684590 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!